Program concept — prepared for LMPD Community Affairs & Metro Council review — not an official LMPD publication
A proposal for Louisville Metro Police Department

Ages 14–19 have
no path into policing.

Since the Explorer program was shut down in 2017, there has been no structured, hands-on way for Louisville teens to learn about law enforcement before adulthood. This proposal outlines how to rebuild that path — with safeguards built in from day one, not added after the fact.

0
Programs open
to ages 14–19
8
Patrol areas this
could rotate through
2 mo
Minimum before
ride-along eligibility
Youth Public Safety Academy shield logo
Before Anything Else

What happened in 2017, and why this proposal exists anyway

What actually happened

LMPD's Explorer program — the department's mentoring track for teens interested in law enforcement careers — was shut down in March 2017 after a lawsuit alleged that two officers had sexually abused a teenage participant. More lawsuits followed. Eventually at least seven people came forward, naming two former officers as primary abusers, with a third officer separately charged with abusing a participant. Then-Lieutenant Curtis Flaherty, who ran the Explorer program, was also named in the lawsuits over allegations that he helped conceal the abuse.

The structural failure behind it is worth understanding on its own: Flaherty simultaneously oversaw both the youth program and the department's Public Integrity Unit. That meant the person running the program was also positioned to control whether complaints about it ever surfaced. One of the officers was investigated in 2013–2014 over alleged misconduct with a female participant; when he resigned in 2014, the investigation was closed without ever determining whether there were other victims.

The response — what's true today

Why that history doesn't settle the question

None of that is in dispute, and this proposal doesn't ask anyone to look past it. But it's also true that every teenager who might want this experience today had absolutely nothing to do with what happened in 2017 and before — and right now, they're the ones paying for it, with a complete absence of any structured way to explore this career path before they're old enough to just apply for the job.

The failure in 2017 wasn't that a youth program existed. It was that one person controlled both the program and the oversight of it, that there was no independent way for a participant to be heard, and that the department's instinct afterward was to conceal records instead of release them. Those are specific, fixable structural problems — not permanent reasons this kind of program can never exist safely again.

Other youth-serving organizations have faced their own versions of this exact crisis and rebuilt with real structural fixes instead of shutting down for good — separating leadership from oversight, banning one-on-one contact, requiring background checks that get renewed, not just run once. This proposal borrows directly from that playbook, translated into what's realistic for how a patrol shift actually works. The gap is real, it's avoidable, and closing it responsibly is possible with today's standards — cameras that are now a mature, long-established part of routine duty rather than a recent rollout, background check systems that didn't exist the same way in 2017, and an oversight structure that doesn't repeat Flaherty's conflict of interest.

Concretely, that means: no single person holds both program leadership and complaint oversight; no unsupervised one-on-one contact between an officer and a participant, ever, on or off duty; background checks that renew on a fixed schedule rather than running once at intake; body-worn cameras following standard department activation policy for any direct interaction — not continuous recording, but the same activation rules as any other duty shift, now a mature and routine part of the job rather than the newly-rolled-out technology it still was in 2017; and an independent reporting channel outside the program's own chain of command, so a complaint doesn't have to go through the person it might be about.

Read This First

The 2-minute summary

Everything below in one scroll. Every page in the full site expands on one piece of this.

The ask, in three sentences

Ages 14–19 currently have zero structured, hands-on way to explore a law enforcement career in Louisville — the Explorer program that used to fill that role was shut down in 2017 after a serious abuse scandal. This proposal rebuilds it with real oversight fixes aimed directly at what failed then: split leadership from oversight, no one-on-one contact, standard body-worn camera policy applied to every interaction, and an independent reporting channel. It's proposed as a phased pilot with a built-in six-month review point, not an open-ended commitment.

The Problem

Zero options today

Nothing exists for ages 14–19.

Option 1 · Preferred

Track A: Rebuilt Academy

Full program, ride-alongs included.

Option 2 · Fallback

Track B: Classroom Pilot

Lower-risk alternative, no ride-alongs at first.

Once Running

Ride-alongs open at month 2

After background check + minimum tenure, either track.

The four safeguards that answer 2017 directly

  1. Split oversight — no one person controls both the program and the review of it, unlike 2017.
  2. No one-on-one contact — rotation-based officer pairing, never exclusive long-term.
  3. Standard body-worn camera policy applies for every interaction — the same activation rules as any other duty shift, not a new ask.
  4. Independent reporting channel — routes around the program's own staff entirely.

What it costs and how long it takes

Rough costs fall into instructor time, range costs, issued field gear, and background checks — sized to fit within or alongside the existing Citizens Academy budget line, not a request for a large new standalone budget. A six-month pilot with a formal review point comes before any commitment beyond that.

Exactly what changed, side by side

2017 FailureThis Proposal's Fix
Program leader also ran the Public Integrity UnitLeadership organizationally separate from oversight, plus direct Chief's Office review
No independent way for a participant to report concernsIndependent, non-officer reporting channel
Unsupervised, undocumented one-on-one contactStandard body-worn camera policy applied to every interaction + rotation-based pairing, no one-on-one contact
Records concealed, released only after legal compulsionAnnual public report, published proactively every year
A 2013–14 complaint closed with no real follow-upBackground checks refreshed periodically, not a one-time check
No formal review point — the program just existed until it collapsedBuilt-in 6-month review with explicit continue/adjust/end criteria
No policy for Explorer-to-Explorer conduct issuesA real Explorer conduct & discipline policy with escalation steps
No check from outside the departmentMetro Council / Public Safety Committee briefed on a set cadence

Go deeper

01 · The Problem

What exists today, and why

A full breakdown of the current program landscape by age, and how it compares to what's available to adults.

Program access, by age

Ages 10–13

Nothing

No LMPD youth program has existed since the Explorer program closed.

Ages 14–19

Nothing hands-on

The age range most likely to be forming career interests has no field-focused on-ramp — only a classroom-only college track starting at 18.

Ages 18–20

College Citizens Academy

An 11-week evening program for college-age students, capped at 35 participants — classroom only, no field component.

Age 21+

Citizens Police Academy

A 12-week program open to anyone who lives or works in Metro Louisville.

How the current programs compare

ProgramCitizens Police AcademyCollege Citizens AcademyProposed Youth Academy
Minimum age21 (in practice)College-age (18–20)14
Length12 weeks11 weeksOngoing, ride-alongs open at month 2
FormatThursday evenings, rotating LMPD facilitiesWeekly evening sessionsWeekly sessions + range + scenario days
Ride-alongsAvailable on requestNot standardAvailable after 2-month minimum
Capacity~30 per session35 per sessionPilot cohort, scaled after review

Why this specific gap matters

Fourteen to nineteen is exactly the window when most people either form or rule out a career interest — it's the same age range served by JROTC, fire Explorer programs, EMT explorer tracks in other cities, and countless trade-focused high school programs. Louisville teens interested in medicine, the military, or the fire service all have structured, hands-on options at this age. Teens interested in law enforcement currently have none.

That gap also has a cost beyond individual opportunity. A youth program is one of the more effective tools a department has for building trust with the next generation of residents in the communities it patrols. It's also a recruitment pipeline: an Explorer who spends several years in a structured program before turning 21 is a pre-vetted, already-trained future applicant — worth factoring in for a department managing its own staffing levels.

Why now?

The political moment

In late December 2025, a federal judge dismissed the proposed DOJ consent decree with LMPD after the Justice Department moved to abandon it earlier that year. The judge's ruling put it directly: responsibility for leading LMPD's reform "must remain with the city's elected representatives and the people they serve." That's a genuinely contested local issue — the FOP opposed the consent decree, while some community advocates wanted it kept — and this proposal doesn't take a side on that debate.

What it does mean practically: city and department leadership have now said, on the record, that reform in Louisville is a locally-led responsibility — not something imposed from Washington. A transparent, locally-designed youth program with real oversight built in is exactly the kind of initiative that fits the reform posture city leaders have already committed to owning themselves.

Beyond the political timing, three practical reasons this is worth doing now rather than later

  1. The infrastructure already exists. The Citizens Academy runs on the same evening/Saturday format, the same instructor pool, and the same budget line this proposal would extend — this isn't a request to build something from scratch.
  2. The safety fixes are more reliable now than they were in 2017. Body-worn cameras existed by 2017 — LMPD rolled them out in 2015 — but they were still fairly new technology, and consistent activation habits and accountability practices around them were still maturing department-wide. Today, camera use is a long-established, routine part of the job rather than a recent rollout, which makes consistent compliance a much more reasonable expectation to build a program around. The same is true for the background-check systems and reporting infrastructure this proposal relies on — the structural failure that caused 2017 is measurably harder to repeat today than it was then.
  3. Every year the gap stays open is a year of lost recruitment pipeline. As covered on the Logistics page, an Explorer who spends several years in a structured program before turning 21 is a pre-vetted, already-trained future applicant — an advantage that compounds the longer the program runs, and one LMPD isn't currently building toward at all.
02 · The Ask

Two tracks forward, ranked

What approval are we asking for?

Specifically: sponsorship to advance this to a formal pilot proposal — command staff backing to take it through Chief's Office review, budget-office costing, and Metro Council coordination. This is not a request to approve a final budget or launch date today, and it is not a request for a permanent, unreviewable commitment; the six-month built-in review point below still applies once a pilot is running.

LMPD retains full operational control and decision-making authority over this program, start to finish. No outside organization runs any part of it, staffs it, or has a vote in how it's run — the department's own command staff, instructors, and existing Citizens Academy infrastructure would run the whole thing. The Metro Council briefing referenced in the oversight structure below is a transparency check, not shared control: LMPD decides, Metro Council is kept informed. This document is a proposal for LMPD's consideration, not a plan the author expects any ongoing role in beyond this pitch.

Preferred · Track A

Rebuilt Youth Academy

A modern version of the Explorer program, with structural safeguards designed around exactly what failed in 2017 — not bolted on afterward. Runs year-round with ongoing enrollment, matching how Explorer-style programs typically operate elsewhere, rather than a fixed-length course.

  • Program leadership separate from Public Integrity Unit oversight
  • Multi-layer supervision, including direct Chief's Office review
  • Independent, non-officer reporting channel for concerns
  • Recorded classroom & facility sessions
  • Ride-along rotation opens after a 2-month minimum
  • Full curriculum: classroom, range, scenario, and specialty unit exposure
Fallback · Track B

Teen Public Safety Academy

Same educational core as the adult Citizens Academy, scaled for high schoolers. A pilot LMPD can approve with minimal new risk, run as a defined 4–6 month cycle rather than a year-round commitment.

  • Classroom, range, and scenario training only, to start
  • Runs alongside existing Citizens Academy infrastructure
  • Built-in review period before ride-alongs are added
  • Path to merge into Track A after the pilot period

Oversight structure

No single person would control both the program and the review of it — the exact structural failure that let 2017 happen. As proposed, oversight would run through several separate layers:

Layer 1
Chief's Office

Direct, periodic review of program status, incident logs, and any filed reports — not delegated away entirely.

Layer 2
Command Staff Liaison

A member of command staff (e.g. an Assistant Chief) with direct reporting responsibility for the program, organizationally separate from Professional Standards / Public Integrity.

Layer 3
Program Coordinator

Runs day-to-day scheduling, curriculum, and instructor assignment. Reports to the command staff liaison, not the other way around.

Layer 4
Independent Reporting Channel

A non-officer contact for teens or parents to raise concerns, routed outside the program's own staff entirely.

External Check
Metro Council / Community Affairs

Briefed on a set cadence, providing a check from outside the department entirely.

First 90 days after approval

The administrative path from sponsorship to Cohort 1 — a different, earlier timeline than the program rollout below.

Days 01–30

Internal Review

Command liaison appointed → Legal/Risk review → Community Affairs/Training review → FOP consultation → proposed policies revised.

Days 30–60

Program Development

Finalize curriculum → select participating personnel → establish reporting procedures → finalize consent documents → confirm facilities → establish application process.

Days 60–90

Launch Preparation

Officer training → parent orientation materials → recruitment/outreach → applications → participant screening → cohort selection.

Then: Cohort 1 begins, and the month-by-month rollout below takes over.

Rollout, by month

A phased path, not an all-at-once ask.

Month 0–2

Classroom, Policy & Scenario Training

Every Explorer starts here regardless of track. UOF policy, scenario roleplay, equipment familiarization — no ride-alongs yet.

Month 2

Ride-Along Eligibility Opens

Minimum 2 months in the program, plus background check consent on file, before an Explorer is eligible for the ride-along rotation. This opens general eligibility — specific gear like handcuffs still requires its own item-by-item proficiency sign-off before an Explorer is authorized to carry it, per the Equipment page.

Month 2+

Rotation Continues

Ride-alongs run alongside ongoing classroom and scenario modules for the rest of the program — not a one-time capstone.

What each track needs to launch

  1. Staffing: A program coordinator role, plus a named command staff liaison — never the same person.
  2. Facilities: Rotating classroom space across divisions (already used for the Citizens Academy) plus range access for firearms familiarization.
  3. Screening: Background check process for any officer volunteering to work with minors, renewed periodically.
  4. Enrollment: Parent/guardian consent and waiver system, built before the first cohort starts.
03 · What Training Includes

Curriculum, module by module

Rotating through LMPD's actual units and divisions, with real hands-on exposure — not a classroom-only experience.

Classroom & Policy
MOD 01

Patrol Operations

Beat structure, radio codes and procedure, how a traffic stop is conducted from initiation to close, and the general rhythm of a patrol shift.
ClassroomWeekly
MOD 02

Use of Force & Department Policy

A full walkthrough of LMPD's use-of-force continuum and department rules and regulations, including direct discussion of the difference between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law — what's technically permitted versus what the policy is actually meant to achieve.
  • LMPD's use-of-force policy, tier by tier
  • Department SOPs relevant to patrol and community contact
  • Case-based discussion: policy intent vs. literal reading
ClassroomInstructor-led
MOD 03

Crime Scene & Investigations

Evidence handling and chain of custody, forensic basics, and how a case actually moves from initial scene response through to court.
Classroom + demo
MOD 04

Traffic & Accident Investigation

Scene reconstruction basics, accident report procedure, and how investigating officers determine fault and sequence of events.
Classroom
Hands-On & Scenario Training
MOD 05

Scenario-Based Roleplay

Simulated calls and roleplay traffic stops, run with instructors and trained role-players, focused on communication, de-escalation, and procedure under realistic pressure.
Hands-onInstructor-supervised
MOD 06

Force-on-Force Simulator Training

Sim-gun and use-of-force simulator scenarios focused on split-second decision-making, directly tied back to the Module 02 policy discussion.
Hands-onDirect supervision
MOD 07

Firearms Familiarization

Supervised range time, following the same established model already used in LMPD's adult Citizens Police Academy firearms familiarization course.
  • Certified range instructor supervision throughout
  • Safety briefing and range rules required before live-fire portion
  • Signed parent/guardian consent specific to this module
RangeCertified instructor
MOD 08

Equipment & Tool Exposure

Hands-on familiarization with taser, baton, and other less-lethal tools, under direct instructor supervision throughout.
Hands-onDirect supervision
MOD 09

Specialty Unit Demonstrations

Live demonstrations and Q&A directly with unit members — rotating through the full range of specialty and investigative units, not just a couple of the more visible ones.
  • K9 Unit
  • SWAT
  • Drone / UAS Unit
  • Air Unit (helicopter)
  • Mounted (Horse) Unit
  • Traffic Unit
  • Dive / Underwater Unit
  • Bomb Squad
  • Homicide Unit
  • Narcotics
  • Criminal Interdiction
  • Forensic Investigations / Crime Scene Unit
  • Robbery / Financial Crimes
  • Crisis Intervention Team
  • Community Policing Unit
  • Special Events Unit
DemoCentralized, not division-based
MOD 10

First Aid, CPR & BLS Certification

A dedicated first aid track built around the IFAK Explorers already carry on ride-alongs — not just a one-off demo. Run in partnership with Louisville Metro EMS.
  • All Explorers: CPR/AED certification, no age floor
  • Explorers 16+: full BLS Provider certification, matching the minimum age most training centers set for that specific credential
Classroom + hands-onEMS-instructed
MOD 11

Interagency Training Days

Joint exercises with Louisville Metro EMS and Louisville Fire Department, giving Explorers exposure to how these agencies actually work together on scene, not just LMPD in isolation.
  • Mass-casualty / active-threat response coordination
  • Vehicle extrication and crash-scene management
  • Joint first aid and triage scenarios
Hands-onMulti-agency
MOD 12

Ride-Along Rotation

Opens after a 2-month minimum in the program and background check consent on file — see the Policies page for full ride-along rules. That covers general eligibility only; individual pieces of gear, like handcuffs, still require their own demonstrated-proficiency sign-off per item, per the Equipment page.
FieldMonth 2+
MOD 13

Special Event Details

Explorers assist at major Louisville events — the Kentucky Derby, Louder Than Life, and Waterfront festivals — in supervised, non-enforcement roles, the same way established Explorer programs elsewhere staff community events.
  • Crowd flow direction and pedestrian guidance
  • Community engagement / information booths
  • First aid station support, tied directly into the EMS partnership from Module 10
FieldSupervised, non-enforcement
Issued Equipment

What's issued, what's explicitly excluded, and the real-world department policy it's based on now has its own dedicated page.

04 · Gear & Equipment

What's issued, and what isn't

Modeled directly on documented, currently-operating Explorer program policy — not invented from scratch.

Every item below is drawn from real, currently-operating police department Explorer programs — not guessed at. The line drawn around what's excluded is the same line those programs draw: issued equipment supports the role, supervision controls how it's used, and nothing here grants independent enforcement authority.

Issued to every Explorer

ITEM

Uniform

Standard issue, worn for classroom sessions, demonstrations, and ride-alongs. Remains department property, returned if an Explorer leaves the program.
Always worn on duty
ITEM

Protective Vest (Soft Body Armor)

Worn underneath the uniform shirt during ride-alongs, not as an outer visible vest — keeps the uniform looking professional and consistent while still giving Explorers the same basic protection standard for anyone riding along in a patrol vehicle.
Ride-along onlyWorn under uniform
ITEM

High-Visibility Traffic Vest

A separate reflective vest marked "EXPLORER," issued for situations that call for high visibility — traffic control at large events, or assisting at a crash scene. Worn over the uniform only when the situation calls for it, not as everyday wear.
Event / crash-scene use
ITEM

Duty Belt

Carries the approved items below — issued for ride-alongs and scenario/simulation training specifically, not everyday classroom wear. Agencies including Las Vegas Metro, Tampa PD, and San Leandro PD follow the same structure: the belt is functional gear tied to a supervised activity, not part of the standard uniform worn at all times. No weapons beyond what's explicitly listed here.
Ride-alongs & scenario training
ITEM

Portable Radio

Issued during ride-alongs specifically. Explorers may monitor and, under direct officer supervision, use standard department communications and ten-codes — Explorers do not operate the radio independently.
Ride-along onlyDirect supervision
ITEM

Tactical Tourniquet / Trauma Kit

A basic Individual First Aid Kit (IFAK) — tourniquet, gauze, chest seal — plus a CPR mask and surgical-style gloves. Self and bystander safety equipment, not enforcement gear, and directly reinforced by the First Aid & CPR module in the curriculum.
Ride-along only
ITEM

Handcuffs

Issued for ride-alongs and scenario/simulation training, kept in a closed carrying case — the same model used by Las Vegas Metro's and San Leandro's Explorer programs. Tampa PD's program goes a step further and authorizes each individual piece of ride-along equipment only after an Explorer has demonstrated proficiency with it; this proposal follows that same standard rather than issuing gear by default. Use is restricted to direct supervision and explicit direction from the supervising officer at all times — an Explorer never decides independently to restrain anyone, consistent with the rule that Explorers may not guard or search suspects, complete arrests, or operate independently.
Ride-alongs & scenario trainingProficiency-gatedDirect supervision required
ITEM

Rescue Tool

A collapsible tool authorized strictly for rescue situations — such as breaking a vehicle window during an extraction — never carried or used as a weapon.
Ride-along onlyRescue use only

Explicitly excluded

Drawn from the same real department policies, not a separate, stricter standard invented for this proposal:

ExcludedWhy
FirearmsNever issued or carried, on or off ride-along — universal across every Explorer program reviewed for this proposal
Independent arrest or enforcement authorityExplorers may assist when directed but may not complete an arrest, guard or search a suspect, or act on their own initiative
Tasers, chemical repellents, sapsExcluded from issued equipment across established Explorer programs
Operating the police radio independentlyExplorers may monitor and assist under direct supervision only
05 · Where It Happens

Divisions, beats, and the rotation

Rotating through every part of the county — not centered in one neighborhood.

LMPD patrols Jefferson County through eight numbered divisions. Rotating Explorers through all eight — rather than centering the program in one area — means teens from every part of the county get the same hands-on access, and the program builds community trust broadly instead of in just one neighborhood.

Map of Louisville and Jefferson County, Kentucky

Division boundaries shown are an illustrative reference overlay, not official LMPD boundary data — official beat and division maps are maintained through LMPD's MapIt system.

1
First Div.
2
Second Div.
3
Third Div.
4
Fourth Div.
5
Fifth Div.
6
Sixth Div.
7
Seventh Div.
8
Eighth Div.

What each division covers

Real neighborhoods, so the rotation reads as concrete rather than abstract:

1
First Division

Downtown-adjacent, including Portland, Russell, and Phoenix Hill.

2
Second Division

Shawnee, Chickasaw, and Park DuValle.

3
Third Division

Iroquois Park, Pleasure Ridge Park, Valley Station, and Fairdale.

4
Fourth Division

Smoketown, Churchill Downs, the Fairgrounds, South Louisville, and Old Louisville.

5
Fifth Division

The Highlands, Clifton, and Cherokee & Seneca Parks.

6
Sixth Division

Audubon Park, Newburg, the airport, and the GE Appliance Park area.

7
Seventh Division

Okolona, Fern Creek, Fords, and the Jefferson Mall area.

8
Eighth Division

The county's eastern reaches, including the Jeffersontown and LaGrange Road corridor.

Beats within a division

Each division breaks further into beats — smaller zones assigned to individual officers. The specific beat lines are LMPD's own operational data, maintained through the department's Research & Development Unit and its public MapIt tool, and aren't reproduced here — but the concept is straightforward:

An Explorer rotating through, say, the Fourth Division over several weeks isn't seeing one static area — they're seeing however many beats that division is broken into, each with its own officer and its own character, from Old Louisville's density to South Louisville's residential streets. Rotating across all eight divisions over the course of the program means exposure to dozens of distinct beats, not just one.

How the rotation works

  1. Classroom sessions rotate location across all eight areas over the course of the program, so no single division hosts every session.
  2. Ride-along assignments (once eligible at month 2) are scheduled by rotation through the same eight areas, not concentrated in one division.
  3. Specialty demonstrations (K9, SWAT) are centralized, since those units aren't assigned to individual divisions.
06 · Policy

Rules, by audience

Every safeguard below maps to something specific that failed in 2017 — not generic caution.

Enrollment

  • Open to ages 14–19, with signed parent/guardian consent and liability waiver
  • Background check consent required before ride-along rotation begins

Conduct & Communication

  • All group communication runs through an official channel that includes instructors — no private one-on-one messaging with a single officer
  • Any concern can be reported through a channel that does not run through the officer, unit, or program staff involved

Ride-Along Rotation (After 2-Month Minimum)

  • Officer assignment is scheduled by rotation; Explorers may rank preferences, but pairing isn't exclusive long-term
  • Full shift coverage under LMPD's standard body-worn camera policy — same as any other shift
  • The 2-month mark opens general eligibility only — specific gear like handcuffs requires its own proficiency sign-off before an Explorer is authorized to carry it, per the Equipment page

Range & Equipment Modules

  • Certified instructor supervision required for all firearms and equipment modules
  • Separate signed consent required specifically for the range module

Before Enrollment

  • Signed consent and waiver required for every Explorer, every session type
  • Full curriculum and schedule provided in advance
  • Separate consent required for the firearms familiarization module

During the Program

  • Notified in advance of ride-along assignments: officer name, callsign, and shift window
  • A reporting contact independent of the program's day-to-day staff, for any concern

Oversight

  • The program is reviewed by more than one layer of the department — see the Proposal page for the full oversight structure, including direct Chief's Office review
Informational NoteThis program exists because of what happened in 2017. Every policy above was written to directly answer a specific failure from that case — not as a general precaution.

Eligibility

  • Specific background screening for any officer working with minors, refreshed periodically — not a one-time check
  • Voluntary assignment, reviewed and approved by division leadership

Oversight

  • Program leadership is organizationally separate from whoever handles internal complaints about it
  • Standard body-worn camera policy applies for the full shift — no change from normal duty
  • Explorer pairing is scheduled by rotation, not self-selected repeatedly with the same Explorer

Instruction Modules

  • Range and equipment modules require certified instructor status
  • Scenario/simulator modules require completion of a program-specific instructor briefing

Explorer conduct & discipline

Everything above covers what happens if an officer does something wrong. This covers the reverse — what happens if an Explorer does.

Code of conduct, in plain terms: The code requires no drugs or alcohol before or during any session, consistent attendance and punctuality, equipment used only as authorized, respectful treatment of instructors and other Explorers, and direct compliance with a supervising officer's instructions during ride-alongs and events.

Peer conduct specifically: The rank structure on the Hierarchy page creates a mentorship relationship between an Explorer Sergeant and newer Explorers — not authority to discipline them. Bullying or misuse of that relationship is treated as seriously as any other conduct violation, and the same independent reporting channel used for concerns about officers is equally available for a concern about another Explorer.

Escalation steps

  1. Verbal correction — for a first, minor issue (tardiness, a dress-code miss).
  2. Written notice, parent notified — for a repeated or more serious issue.
  3. Suspension from ride-along eligibility — pending review, for anything touching safety or equipment misuse.
  4. Removal from the program — for severe or repeated violations. Immediate removal, skipping the earlier steps, for anything involving substances, weapons misuse, or safety-threatening behavior.
Informational NoteAn Explorer facing anything beyond a verbal correction gets a conversation with the program coordinator before a decision is finalized — except in immediate-safety cases, where removal comes first and the conversation follows.
07 · Explorer Leadership

Peer ranks, and what they don't carry

A number of established Explorer programs use an internal rank structure for leadership development. This proposal includes one — scoped carefully so it never becomes a substitute for adult supervision.

This is entirely a peer-recognition and leadership-development system. It carries no authority over the public, no enforcement role, and no exception to any supervision rule elsewhere in this proposal — an Explorer Sergeant still can't be paired one-on-one with an officer, still needs the same rotation-based scheduling, still follows every safeguard on the Policies page exactly like a first-month Explorer. What rank changes is responsibility toward other Explorers, not authority over anyone else.

The rank ladder

Bottom to top — this sits entirely below and separate from the adult oversight structure on the Proposal page.

Top Explorer Rank
Explorer Sergeant

Mentors newer Explorers directly — answering logistics questions, helping probationary Explorers get oriented, assisting instructors during scenario drills. Earned through time in program plus instructor sign-off, not automatic promotion.

Full Member
Explorer

Full program member. Ride-along eligible once the 2-month minimum and background check are complete, per the Policies page. Specific gear, like handcuffs, still requires its own proficiency sign-off before it's carried.

Entry Rank
Probationary Explorer

Every Explorer starts here. First 2 months: classroom, scenario, and equipment modules only — no ride-alongs, matching the eligibility timeline on the Logistics page exactly.

Informational NoteRank is earned through time, instructor recommendation, and peer standing — never through proximity to a specific officer. That's a deliberate design choice, not an oversight: tying advancement to one adult's favor is exactly the kind of exclusive relationship the pairing-rotation rule elsewhere in this proposal is built to prevent.

What this structure is for

Real leadership development — planning a scenario day, mentoring a nervous first-month Explorer, representing the group's questions to the program coordinator — without ever touching the actual chain of authority that governs safety. The adult oversight structure on the Proposal page (Chief's Office, command liaison, program coordinator) is where real decisions and real accountability live. This is where Explorers learn to lead each other.

08 · Logistics

How this actually runs

Schedule, application process, staffing, budget, and the built-in review point — so this reads as executable, not conceptual.

Sample weekly schedule

Months 0–2 (before ride-along eligibility):

DayActivityFormat
TuesdayClassroom module (rotating: patrol ops, UOF policy, investigations, traffic)Evening, 2 hrs
ThursdayScenario roleplay or force-on-force simulator trainingEvening, 2 hrs
1st SaturdayRange day (firearms familiarization) or specialty unit demoMorning, 3 hrs

Month 2 onward, once ride-along eligibility opens:

DayActivityFormat
TuesdayClassroom module continues on rotationEvening, 2 hrs
ThursdayScenario training continues on rotationEvening, 2 hrs
Rotating Sat.Ride-along (scheduled by rotation) or range/demo dayShift-length, per division

Application & selection

  1. Interest form — submitted by the teen, with parent/guardian contact info.
  2. Active outreach — recruitment isn't passive. Materials go out through every division, not just families already connected to LMPD, so the cohort reflects the whole county rather than skewing toward kids who already know an officer.
  3. Mandatory parent info session — covers curriculum, safeguards, and consent requirements before anyone enrolls, with interpreters and translated materials available given Louisville's refugee and immigrant communities.
  4. Consent & background check paperwork — filed before the first classroom session, not after.
  5. Cohort placement — capped at roughly 20–25 per cohort, matching the scale of the existing Citizens Academy programs, with two enrollment windows a year (fall and spring) rather than rolling admission.
Informational NoteSessions rotate across all eight patrol areas partly so Explorers without reliable transportation aren't excluded by geography — see the Locations page for the rotation logic.

Staffing & insurance

Program coordinator: This would be a part-time or reassigned role, housed within the existing Community Affairs / Citizens Academy team rather than a new hire from scratch.

Instructors: These would be volunteer officers, background-screened specifically for work with minors and drawn from patrol, range staff, and specialty units already doing similar demonstrations for the adult Citizens Academy. A short "train the trainer" component is built in — being a good officer and being a good instructor for teenagers aren't automatically the same skill, so instructors get specific guidance before they're paired with a cohort.

What the screening actually checks: Criminal history, any sustained Public Integrity Unit findings, and prior terminations or resignations connected to misconduct with minors — the kind of documented, adjudicated outcomes that are the actual basis for excluding someone. An open or pending complaint isn't automatically disqualifying on its own: officers face complaints as a routine part of the job, most are never substantiated, and treating every complaint as guilt-by-accusation would both be unfair to officers and give the screening process the wrong signal to weigh. The distinction the screening is built around is sustained findings and adjudicated outcomes, not the mere existence of a complaint. A pattern of multiple complaints, or any complaint involving a minor specifically, is reviewed directly by the command staff liaison rather than screened out by a simple keyword match.

Instructor incentive: Officers who complete a term as an instructor receive a letter of commendation placed in their personnel file — a low-cost, low-friction way to make volunteering worth something concrete, without requiring Chief-level sign-off on every instance.

Command liaison: An existing member of command staff takes this on as part of their portfolio — not a new position, but a formally assigned responsibility.

FOP consultation: Since this involves officers taking on voluntary extra-duty instruction time and new liability exposure, the River City FOP lodge is looped in as part of the rollout, not after the fact, since this is the kind of thing a union reasonably expects a say in before it's finalized, not something to spring on them.

Insurance & liability: The program would fall under Louisville Metro's existing liability coverage for civilian participation in Citizens Academy activities — including range time and ride-alongs — extended to minors under a signed parent/guardian waiver, the same basic mechanism already used for other city-sponsored youth activities.

What officers get out of it

This isn't only an ask of officers' time — there's a real benefit on their side too:

  1. Relief on the recruitment problem they already feel. Officers dealing with short-staffed shifts and mandatory overtime have a direct stake in a pipeline that produces more pre-vetted future applicants — this isn't an abstract department metric, it's fewer gaps on the schedule they're the ones covering. Building the next generation of officers is, practically speaking, the core long-term value a program like this gives back to the department.
  2. Lower-friction shifts down the line. A teenager who's spent time in a structured program with officers — rather than having zero structured contact until an adversarial one — is more likely to extend the benefit of the doubt on a routine stop years later. That's a plausible, not guaranteed, benefit, but it's the same logic behind why departments run youth programs at all: the contact built now is the working relationship an officer inherits later.
  3. A say before it affects them. The FOP consultation above isn't a formality — officers taking on extra-duty instruction time and new liability exposure get a real voice in how this is structured, before it's finalized rather than after.
  4. A documented leadership credential. The letter of commendation for instructors is concrete, file-backed experience managing and teaching people — the kind of thing that helps in a promotion packet, not just a nice gesture.

Budget estimate

Rough cost categories, meant as a starting point for LMPD's own budget office to refine — timed to Metro's regular budget cycle rather than proposed as a mid-year ask:

CategoryNotes
Instructor timeStipend or overtime for volunteer officer instructors, evenings and Saturdays
Range costsAmmunition and range time, shared with existing Citizens Academy range sessions
Issued field gearUniforms, duty belts, radios, handcuffs, and trauma kits per Explorer — see the Equipment page for the full list
Simulator equipmentForce-on-force / sim-gun training gear for the scenario modules — inert, training-only, separate from issued field gear
Background checksPer-Explorer and per-instructor screening fees
MaterialsPrinted curriculum and waivers

Possible funding sources include a reallocation within the existing Citizens Academy budget line, a Metro Council community program allocation submitted during the regular budget cycle, the Louisville Metro Police Foundation (saferlouisville.org) — the only organization authorized to raise private donations on LMPD's behalf, with programs, equipment, and training as one of its three core focus areas — or a federal community policing grant (the DOJ's COPS Office funds this kind of youth engagement activity in other departments, though on a competitive basis).

The cost of not doing this

Every line above is a real, bounded cost that LMPD's own budget office can size precisely. But doing nothing isn't free either — it's just a cost that doesn't show up on a line item. Every year this gap stays open is a year LMPD isn't building a recruitment pipeline, a year the department misses a low-cost way to build trust with teenagers across every division, and a year Louisville teens interested in this career look elsewhere — to another city's program, another public-safety branch, or nowhere at all. That's not a hypothetical cost. It's the cost this proposal is trying to close.

Balancing school & athletics

Real conflicts for a real teenager — this isn't a scheduling afterthought:

  1. No penalty for missing a session for school or sports — a single excused absence doesn't cost an Explorer their spot, doesn't reset their progress toward the 2-month ride-along eligibility mark, and doesn't get logged as a conduct or performance issue. An athlete in-season or a student with a conflicting commitment doesn't get dropped from the cohort over it; they just make up the material through the recorded session below and stay on the same timeline as everyone else.
  2. Recorded classroom content for any missed classroom module, so an Explorer doesn't fall behind just because a game or a test landed on the wrong night.
  3. A single point of contact — likely the program coordinator — who can communicate directly with a school counselor or coach if the schedule needs coordinating, rather than putting that entirely on a 14-to-19-year-old to sort out alone.
  4. Built around the existing evening/Saturday structure already used by the Citizens Academy. Tuesday and Thursday evenings avoid colliding with the school day itself, but Saturday morning sessions can still land on a game day for a student athlete — which is exactly what the no-penalty and make-up provisions above are built to handle, rather than pretending the conflict doesn't exist.

Built-in review point

This isn't an open-ended commitment

The program is proposed with a formal review point after the first full cohort completes — roughly six months in. At that point, the command liaison presents a report to the Chief's Office and Metro Council with explicit criteria: completion rate, any conduct incidents, and Explorer/parent feedback. The program can be continued, adjusted, or ended at that point. Nothing about this proposal asks for a permanent, unreviewable commitment — and what that means for an individual Explorer if the program doesn't continue is covered on the FAQ page.

Annual public reporting

Every year, the program would publish basic statistics — enrollment numbers, completion rate, ride-along participation, and incident/complaint counts, even when that count is zero — through LMPD's public website. This is a direct answer to the 2017 history: a standing commitment to release information about the program routinely, rather than only after a records request compels it, as happened in 2017.

09 · FAQ & Accountability

The hard questions, answered directly

Including exactly what happens if something does go wrong.

Frequently asked questions

Why should we trust this after 2017?

You shouldn't have to take it on trust — that's the point of the oversight structure. No single person controls both the program and the review of it, the way Flaherty did. There's a Chief's Office review layer, a command staff liaison separate from the Public Integrity Unit, an independent reporting channel, and an annual public report. Trust is built through structure, not asked for up front.

Liability and lawsuit exposure

Given the 2017 history, this is addressed directly:

Why this doesn't add the exposure it looks like it does

The 2017 lawsuits point to a specific gap, not the existence of a youth program itself: contact between an officer and a participant that wasn't supervised, wasn't documented, and had no independent channel to raise concerns. Every safeguard in this proposal — split oversight, no one-on-one contact, standard body-worn camera policy applied to every interaction, rotation-based pairing, an independent reporting channel — is designed to close exactly that gap. A program built this way isn't a smaller version of the same risk; it's structurally a different situation.

There's also a documentation point worth naming directly: standard-policy body-worn camera recording and logging doesn't just deter misconduct — it protects the department in the much more common scenario where nothing happened and a claim is made anyway. Undocumented programs are exposed both ways. Well-documented ones have a real defense on record.

Practically, this also isn't a new category of risk for Metro's insurance and legal exposure. LMPD already carries liability coverage for civilian ride-alongs and range participation through the adult Citizens Academy — this extends the same coverage to a younger age band with more safeguards layered on than the adult version has, not fewer.

None of this is a substitute for Metro's own Law Department actually assessing the exposure — that review should happen before anything launches. But "we might get sued" isn't an argument against building better safeguards; if anything, it's the strongest argument for them.

Other common questions

Isn't this just the Explorer program with a new name?

The curriculum is deliberately similar — that's not a coincidence, it's the point. What's different is everything around it: who supervises it, how complaints get heard, and what gets published publicly every year. The name changing signals a fresh start; the oversight structure changing is what actually matters.

What if an Explorer wants to leave the program?

Any time, no penalty, no explanation required. An optional exit survey helps the program improve, but participation in it is never mandatory.

Who's liable if something goes wrong?

The program operates under Louisville Metro's existing liability framework for civilian participation in Citizens Academy activities, extended to minors through a signed parent/guardian waiver — the same basic coverage mechanism already in place for other city-sponsored youth activities, not something built from scratch.

Why give teens access to firearms training at all?

There's already precedent: LMPD's adult Citizens Police Academy includes a supervised firearms familiarization course. This proposal extends the same certified-instructor, range-supervised model, with a separate signed parental consent specific to that module.

What if a background check flags something after an officer is already assigned to the program?

Depends on what it is. A sustained finding, a new criminal charge, or anything involving a minor specifically triggers immediate reassignment while it's reviewed by the command staff liaison — not left pending or handled informally. An unsubstantiated or still-open complaint, on its own, doesn't automatically pull someone from the program; officers face complaints routinely and most don't hold up, so treating any complaint as an automatic removal would be both unfair to officers and a poor screening standard. The line is substantiated findings versus the mere existence of an accusation — not every red flag looks the same, and this proposal doesn't treat them as if they do.

What happens after an Explorer sees something difficult on a ride-along?

Ride-alongs and specialty modules can expose Explorers to hard scenes — a bad crash, an active call. Rather than inventing something new, this routes through LMPD's existing Chaplain Corps and Peer Support Team — the same resources already used department-wide for exactly this — with a short debrief offered after any ride-along involving a serious incident, and parents notified. This isn't optional or left to the Explorer to bring up on their own.

What if my Explorer does everything right and the program still gets discontinued at the review point?

That's on the program, never on them. Specifically: no penalty and no negative mark of any kind — ending a pilot is a decision about the program's future, not a judgment on any individual. Certifications earned don't disappear — CPR/AED and BLS credentials come from Louisville Metro EMS and the American Heart Association, not LMPD, so they remain valid regardless of what happens to the program itself. Every Explorer receives a formal record of what they completed, not just a verbal "thanks." And if the program is ever relaunched later, past Explorers get first opportunity to return, rather than starting over in a new applicant pool.

Incident response protocol

What actually happens if a concern is raised, step by step:

  1. Report received through the independent, non-officer reporting channel — not through the program's own staff.
  2. Immediate temporary suspension of the officer's contact with the Explorer involved, pending review.
  3. Command liaison and Chief's Office notified within a set window, not left to routine reporting cycles.
  4. Investigation handled outside the program's own staff, consistent with keeping oversight separate from day-to-day operations.
  5. Outcome reported to the parent/guardian directly, and reflected in aggregate in the annual public report.

How this compares nationally

LMPD isn't alone in having to rebuild trust in a youth program after a crisis. The Explorer program's own national parent organization, Learning for Life, now operates under a "two-deep leadership, no one-on-one contact" standard adopted after its own history of abuse cases — two vetted adult leaders (not parents; two background-checked officers or instructors) required at any activity, and no private one-on-one contact between an adult leader and a youth member, digital or otherwise. This proposal's classroom and facility safeguards are built on that same model, adapted for what's actually realistic inside a patrol car.

Success metrics — what "working" looks like after year one

What each number actually measures:

≥80%
Explorers who finish
the full program
0
Complaints left
unresolved
100%
Ride-alongs with
complete camera logs
Tracked
Explorers who later
apply to become LMPD officers

Consent & waiver — what it needs to cover

This is an outline of what a parent/guardian consent and waiver packet should include — not a finished legal document. It would need to be drafted and reviewed by LMPD's own legal counsel before use.

  1. General program consent — acknowledgment of the curriculum, schedule, and safeguards described in this proposal.
  2. Liability waiver — covering classroom, scenario, and facility activities.
  3. Separate firearms-module consent — specific to the range component, distinct from general enrollment.
  4. Background check authorization — required before ride-along eligibility.
  5. Emergency contact & medical information — standard for any in-person youth program.
  6. Photo/media release — if the program documents sessions for internal or public reporting purposes.
  7. Data handling & retention disclosure — plain-language explanation of what personal and background-check information is collected on a minor, how long it's kept, and who has access to it.
10 · Contact & Resources

Contacts & resources

Program contacts, partner organizations, and official links relevant to this proposal.

Proposal Owner

Direct contact for questions about this proposal, before it's formally assigned to a department point of contact.

  • NameJackson Metzler
  • Emailjackson.metzler22@gmail.com
  • Phone502-921-7198

Program contacts

Roles this program would need — described by function, since specific people haven't been assigned yet:

PC
Program Coordinator

Primary point of contact for day-to-day operations, scheduling, and family communication — likely housed within the existing Community Affairs / Citizens Academy team rather than a new hire.

CSL
Command Staff Liaison

Formal oversight responsibility, kept organizationally separate from day-to-day program staff — that separation is a direct, structural answer to the 2017 conflict-of-interest failure.

CA
Community Affairs Contact

Handles public inquiries, media, and coordination with Metro Council and partner agencies as the program moves through review.

Natural allies already in this proposal

Not claimed endorsements — just the institutions this proposal already builds in as partners, worth naming so this doesn't read as a lone ask:

  1. Louisville Metro EMS — co-runs the CPR/BLS certification track and joint interagency training days.
  2. Louisville Fire Department — co-runs the mass-casualty and vehicle-extrication training.
  3. JCPS counselors and coaches — the school/athletics coordination built into the Logistics page depends on this relationship existing in practice, not just on paper.
  4. River City FOP — consulted as part of rollout, not after the fact, given the extra-duty and liability implications for officers.

Important links

Official sources referenced throughout this proposal:

LMPD — Official Website

Department structure, current news, and public records requests.

lmpd.gov

Louisville Metro Council

Council districts, meeting schedules, and the Public Safety Committee.

louisvilleky.gov/government/metro-council

Metro Council District Map

Interactive map of all 26 council districts and their representatives.

District Map (ArcGIS)

Louisville Metro Police Foundation

The only organization authorized to raise private donations on LMPD's behalf — programs, equipment, and training are among its core focus areas.

saferlouisville.org

Sources & citations

Factual claims throughout this proposal, and where they come from — so anything here can be independently verified rather than taken on faith:

  1. 2017 Explorer program shutdown, lawsuits, and Curtis Flaherty's roleFox News, "Report: Louisville police erred in sex abuse case"
  2. Federal conviction of an Explorer program advisor for abuse of a minorU.S. Department of Justice press release
  3. N.C. lawsuit filing and case backgroundReuters, via Yahoo News
  4. Learning for Life's national "two-deep leadership, no one-on-one contact" standardLaw Enforcement Exploring Program Guidelines, Exploring.org
  5. LMPD body-worn camera rollout (2015)Louisville Public Media (WFPL)
  6. Tampa PD's proficiency-gated ride-along equipment policyTampa Police Department Directive 607
  7. Las Vegas Metro PD Explorer equipment and duty belt policyLVMPD Explorer Policy Manual
  8. San Leandro PD Explorer equipment policySan Leandro Police Explorer Post 540 Guidelines

A small number of claims — LMPD's current overall budget figure and the December 2025 dismissal of the proposed DOJ consent decree — are drawn from public reporting at the time this proposal was prepared but aren't linked here with a single confirmed source; LMPD's own records office can verify both directly.